treelaw-logo-line-icon

Boundary Trees

Trees on boundaries can cause issues for numerous reasons.  

Most common is where trees on a boundary grow and roots and branches from the tree encroach over the boundary line and into a neighbour’s property.  This ‘nuisance’ can cause issues such as subsidence damage, direct damage from roots, as well as issues with blocking light, dropping leaves and attracting bird and their droppings. 

There can be issues with trees on boundaries leading to arguments over their ownership. Oak trees, for example, have historically been boundary trees, so there can be disputes over who owns a tree which straddles a boundary.

Boundary ever-green trees can be such a contentious issue that the High Hedges legislation was brought in meaning that you can ultimately get an ASBO against a neighbour where an evergreen hedge is allowed to grow too high.

As they say, good fences make good neighbours. At Tree Law we change fences to trees. So we can help you to keep your boundary trees ‘good’ and avoid boundary dispute issues. We are here for the issues when they do arise too.

We can help...

Where there is a tree of unknown ownership on a boundary.

Encroachment of roots and branches across a boundary causing damage.

Advice on your legal rights to remove roots and branches to the boundary line.

High Hedge disputes, whether as a tree owner or a local authority bringing a criminal claim.

Other issues such as blocking light, dropping sap, dropping berries.

Highly recommended "They are a super professional wonderful company."

From a client who had an allegation made that a boundary tree was causing subsidence, and other issues, at a neighbouring property.
Consumer
Litigation - Insurance disputes

Hourly Rate

We can advise on all matters relating to boundary trees. Where issues might extend into grazing livestock and boundary trees, we can refer you to our preferred agricultural law supplier to help you

Get in touch for a discovery discussion about your situation so that we can agree a way forward and an appropriate fee structure.

Case Studies

  • Tree Law’s Client: Home owner
  • Outcome: Party Wall Act award agreed retrospectively

 

Our client contacted us concerned about the removal of trees on the boundary line between their property and next door.  Next door had planning permission to build an extension which was due to be constructed right up to their boundary line.  Without requesting the client’s permission, trees on the boundary line belonging ot our client were removed and foundations were dug for the new construction.  Not only was this likely trespass and criminal damage for removing trees on our client’s land, the digging of the foundations was carried out without the Party Wall Act process being complied with. 

This led to significant concerns by our client, made worse by the fact that removal of boundary trees had led to the ground becoming more water logged.  Due to the importance of compliance with the Party Wall Act, our involvement led to the Party Wall Act being complied with retrospectively in order to limit any further issues with the construction works.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel for free video content on commonly asked legal questions

x  Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
Shield Security